This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Mitchell, W. Articles by Shaver, J. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Who Buys What? How Integration Capability Affects Acquisition Incidence and Target Choice

Duke University, USA, will.mitchell{at}duke.edu

J. Myles Shaver

University of Minnesota, USA, mshaver{at}csom.umn.edu

Firms differ in their integration capability, which is the ability to absorb and manage businesses on a continuing basis. We expect integration capability heterogeneity to influence acquisition strategy by profit-seeking firms, affecting both their propensity to acquire and the types of businesses that they target. We argue that a firm's integration capability increases with its product line scope and test two hypotheses: (I) firms with greater existing product line scope are more likely to be acquirers; and (2) firms with greater product line scope are more likely to purchase product lines that they already operate. Data from the US medical sector between 1978 and 1995 support hypothesis I .We then find that all firms tended to purchase product lines that they did not previously operate, but, consistent with hypothesis 2, that firms with greater product line scope made acquisitions that had greater overlap with their existing product lines. The results are analogous with the biological observation that the most successful predators are better able to target desirable prey as well as being better able to overpower the prey they target.

Key Words: acquisitions • business dynamics • integration capability • routines

Strategic Organization, Vol. 1, No. 2, 171-201 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1476127003001002305


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?