Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Strategic Organization
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pollock, T. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The benefits and costs of underwriters’ social capital in the US initial public offerings market

Timothy G. Pollock

Pennsylvania State University, USA, tpollock{at}psu.edu

This study explores the factors that influence the degree to which brokers in mediated markets employ their social capital to benefit either buyers or sellers in the context of underwriters’ involvement in the US initial public offerings (IPO) market. This study finds that the embeddedness of the lead underwriter with institutional investors in an IPO deal network is negatively associated with IPO stock underpricing when demand for the offering is low, thereby benefiting the seller, but is positively associated with the amount of underpricing when demand for the IPO is high, thereby benefiting the buyers. High underwriter embeddedness with institutional investors also reduces the negative relationship between underwriters’ reputation and underpricing.

Key Words: embeddedness • initial public offering • markets • reputation • social capital

Strategic Organization, Vol. 2, No. 4, 357-388 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1476127004047618


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Strategic OrganizationHome page
T. G. Pollock and R. Gulati
Standing out from the crowd: the visibility-enhancing effects of IPO-related signals on alliance formation by entrepreneurial firms
Strategic Organization, November 1, 2007; 5(4): 339 - 372.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Strategic OrganizationHome page
T. Baker and T. G. Pollock
Making the marriage work: the benefits of strategy's takeover of entrepreneurship for strategic organization
Strategic Organization, August 1, 2007; 5(3): 297 - 312.
[PDF]


Home page
Strategic OrganizationHome page
R. Ragozzino and J. J. Reuer
Initial public offerings and the acquisition of entrepreneurial firms
Strategic Organization, May 1, 2007; 5(2): 155 - 176.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Strategic OrganizationHome page
T. C. Reeves, E. W. Ford, W. J. Duncan, and P. M. Ginter
Communication clarity in strategic management data sources
Strategic Organization, August 1, 2005; 3(3): 243 - 278.
[Abstract] [PDF]